Sent: Friday, September 21,
2018 2:22 PM
Subject: Turning California
around can turnaround our nation
My
Comments: I
wrote the article below, CALIFORNIA IS NO LONGER A REPUBLIC, and instead
is effectively an oligarchy. I have submitted this to my local newspaper
as a letter to the editor and hopefully it will get printed.
I
believe, that if we can turn California around, we can turn the nation
around.
Many of
us have become sickened by what has and is transpiring in our State.
However, I see the State of Jefferson and New California movements as futile
and counterproductive. Also, I see the recent attempt to get a
proposition on the ballot to split California into 3 states as a Leftist move
to split California in such a way as to maintain large metropolitan centers in
each of the three states such that the Leftists would control each State, and
thus create further Leftist domination over our nation.
As a
consequence of the above, I see the need to motivate action towards a movement
to turn California around to support our founding values. To succeed this
endeavor, it would have to focus on convincing populations in the cities and
universities as to the efficacy. As a student at Berkeley during the
60’s, I saw first hand so much of the movements that
eventually took this nation on a wrong path. I also saw that much of what
motivated young people was the momentum and effects of peer pressure combined
with the natural tendency of youth to rebel against the establishment.
As such,
it is surprising that our youth in the cities and universities are so willing
to submit to the Leftist propaganda and support the existing establishment—such
current establishment being a combination of the Left and the swamp.
The Leftist
vision of Socialism/Communism is one that has been proven time and again to be
an utter failure, lead to deprivation, tyranny, untold deaths of citizens—for
which the Leftists sell this vision based on the premise that past (as well as
existing attempts) were simply faulty attempts that could, if properly
executed, succeed. This is a pretty
pathetic argument, except that the gullible buy into it. They look at the quasi Socialist European
nations as signs of success, negating the reality that their socialist
experiments have been of short duration and are also moving in the direction of
non-sustainability.
The Left
is running out of steam. Short of
projecting their shortcomings on the opposition, name calling and the promotion
of various remarks of hatred, they lack coherence. It is time to turn those caught up in the
Leftist propaganda around. To win them
to a positive, workable agenda for how a nation should operate.
A more
positive vision—one which unfortunately the Conservatives/Republicans/Libertarians/Rightests do not articulate—should if properly presented
and promoted to sway the majority of those who are currently following the Pied
Piper of the Left.
I believe
there is a way to reach the youth (as well as adults) in a way that they will
cause them to want to change their allegiance and be motivated to rebel against
the Leftist/Swamp establishment—in favor of a vision for America that will
truly be a path to promote opportunity for all:
We need
to promote the Policy of the U.S.A. – a policy that I believe is articulated in
the Preamble to the Constitution: “We the People of the United States,
in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and
secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
The founders vision for America is a wonderful vision, but also
one that has been corrupted from the outset by those who wish to limit the
power of We the People to self-govern our nation. Each of the elements
listed in the Preamble has been corrupted. It is in defining each of
those elements, explaining how they were corrupted, and what is needed to
repair them that will enlighten the public to how we can bring our nation to
conform to the founders vision and compliance with our Constitution—and in that
regard, make America great again.
To
accomplish this, is going to take convincing and gaining the allegiance of our
cities and universities. If this can be accomplished in California, it
will be the impetus to transform our nation to what it should be.
A major
obstacle that I see in the large metropolitan areas is getting good information
to the public and overcoming the peer pressure that frightens people into
towing the line for fear they will be ostracized. This will take a big effort
and would best be served if we can get people with talent in film production
involved—as video/films will be absolutely essential to penetrating the
darkness that currently prevails in our cities and universities.
What do
you think?
See my
email below regarding why California is no longer a republic:
CALIFORNIA IS NO LONGER
A REPUBLIC
The State
of California is no longer a republic, but instead a oligarchy comprised of a small number of
politicians. The politicians wield power due to disproportionate representation
given to the large metropolitan areas of the state. Under this scenario, the
democratic process is a sham that has completely undermined the concept of a
functioning representative republic.
Article
4, Section 4 of the Constitution provides:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a
Republican Form of Government…”
In order
to rectify a situation where Los Angeles and other large metropolitan areas had
acquired exorbitant control over the political process, the electorate changed
the dynamics of the State Senate to mirror the U.S. Senate, via a 1926 ballot
proposition 28. This limited any county
from having more than one Senator (in 1911, Los Angeles County had 8 Senators,
and three bay area counties combined had 13 Senators, giving majority control
to those 4 heavily populated counties in both house of the legislature).
After
proposition 28 passed, those same 4 counties had 4 Senators total instead of
the 21, and the balance of power in the state was restored—the Assembly still
represented the population, but the Senate represented the diverse interests of
the various counties (similar to the U.S. Senate).
Thanks to
the Warren Court decision in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), the
California Senate was required to revert to the pre-Proposition 28
configuration. While I challenge the Warren Court had any jurisdiction to
interfere with the internal configuration of a state legislature—an example of
judicial overreach—it did usurp authority and the States complied.
As a
result, Los Angeles County now has 14 of the 40 State Senators, and the large
metropolitan centers of the bay area and Los Angeles combined control both the
Assembly and Senate once again. With a few politicians from these few
counties controlling the show, the rest of the State be damned.
Representative
government by We the People only works effectively
when the representative district is small enough that the people can select the
candidates. Our nation’s founders
thought the maximum practical size was in the range of 50 to 60 thousand
population. California has 80 Assembly
districts and 40 Senate districts. Based
on the current population, the average Assembly district encompasses a
population close to 500,000 people, and the Senate Districts close to 1,000,000
people. Under such a scenario, the
public cannot select candidates known to them, but are dependent upon what big
money and special interests offer as their choices come election time.
Candidates who represent the people—and not special interests—become the
exception rather than the rule.
The
primary election process (which I believe is counterproductive to the process
of a representative government) has been further skewed by two factors:
1) The
California State primary is open, such that regardless of a person’s political
party registration, one can vote for any candidate, regardless of political
party.
2) The
passage 2010 of a top two ballot initiative, the top two vote getters are the ones
selected to compete in the election.
Both of these undermine the political party system. In the last election, two Democratic
candidates competed for U.S. Senate with no Republican candidate on the
ballot.
Under the
current scenario in California, the heavily populated metropolitan areas
control both houses of the state legislature.
The dynamics of urban areas favors the dominance of a single political
ideology, and the extreme size of the legislative districts (500,000 and
1,000,000) favor dominance by big money/special interests.
By in
large, majority controlling state legislators act independent of the best
interests of the public, creating law to suit their ideologies or whims.
California
is no longer a republic. It is a one
party state, controlled by a political oligarchy of 121 (40 plus to control the
Assembly, 20 plus to control the Senate, and a governor) so-called
representatives.
Dumbed
down and naïve people may think they have a choice in California, but they
don’t.